Other Historians’ Perspectives on the Emancipation Proclamation

Camara Dia Holloway:

Add your thoughts here… (optional)

Originally posted on Civil War Emancipation:

Not surprisingly, other historians are weighing in on the sesquicentennial of the Emancipation Proclamation. Here is what I’ve come across so far. No doubt there is more to come. Readers: feel free to send me links to any other essays of this sort you come across.

Eric Foner, “The Emancipation Proclamation at 150: Abraham Lincoln’s turning-point” (in The Guardian). Some good thoughts on the Emancipation Proclamation from the dean of Reconstruction historians. I appreciate that Foner reminded me that the Preliminary version had a last overture to the slave states to accept gradual compensated emancipation.

Allen Guelzo, “How Lincoln Saved the ‘Central Idea’ of America” (in the Wall Street Journal). A nice piece from the most prominent proponent of the Emancipation Proclamation’s centrality in freeing the slaves. Still, I respectfully disagree with Guelzo on the practicality of returning contrabands to slavery had there been…

View original 214 more words

About these ads
This entry was posted in opinion by Camara Dia Holloway. Bookmark the permalink.

About Camara Dia Holloway

Dr. Holloway is an art historian who earned her MA, MPhil, and PhD at Yale University in the History of Art Department. Her BA degree is from Barnard College where she majored in art history. She is currently Assistant Professor of American Art at the University of Delaware.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s